|
From Chapter 5:
Capitalist Planning and the Price System (p. 137)
This excerpt is taken from George Reisman, Capitalism: A Treatise
on Economics. Ottawa, Illinois: Jameson Books, 1996. Copyright © 1996 by George
Reisman. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without written permission
of the author. The following limited exception is granted: Namely, provided they are
reproduced in full and include this copyright notice and are made for noncommercial
use, i.e., for use other than for sale, including use as part of any publication that is
sold, copies of this excerpt may be downloaded into personal computers and distributed
electronically or on paper printouts from a personal computer; reproduction on the
internet is permitted provided the copy of the excerpt is accompanied by the following
link to the Jefferson School's home page (which may, and hopefully will, be displayed
elsewhere and more prominently): The Jefferson School
of Philosophy, Economics, and Psychology. This limited right of reproduction expires
on December 31, 1999.
This page has been visited times since August 7, 1999.
Division of labor in the planning process is possible only under capitalism. This is
because of the existence of the price system, which is unique to capitalism. Under
capitalism each individual plans his own particular sphere of economic activity. But he
plans on the basis of a consideration of prices--the prices he will receive as a seller
and must pay as a buyer.
The consideration of prices is what integrates and harmonizes the plans of each
individual with the plans of all other individuals and produces a fully and rationally
planned economic system under capitalism. For example, a student changes his career plan
from actor to accountant when he contemplates the vast difference in income he can expect
to earn. A prospective home buyer changes his plan concerning which neighborhood to live
in when he compares house prices in the different neighborhoods. And businesses change
their plans concerning product lines, methods and locations of production, and every other
aspect of their activities, in response to profit-and-loss calculations.
All of these changes represent the adjustment of the plans of particular individuals
and businesses to the plans of others in the economic system. For it is the plans of
others to purchase accounting services rather than acting services that cause the higher
income our student can expect to earn as an accountant rather than as an actor. It is the
plans of others willing and able to pay more to live in certain neighborhoods, and less to
live in certain others, that determine the relative house prices confronting our home
buyer. It is the plans of its prospective customers, of all competing sellers of its
goods, and of all other buyers of the means of production it uses or otherwise depends on,
that enter into the formation of the prices determining the revenues and costs of any
business firm and thus what it finds profitable or unprofitable to produce.
Now the fact that capitalism even has economic planning, let alone the only
possible kind of rational economic planning, is almost completely unknown. Practically
everyone under capitalism has been in the position of Molière's M. Jourdan, who spoke
prose all his life without ever knowing it. The overwhelming majority of people have not
realized that all the thinking and planning about their economic activities that they
perform in their capacity as individuals actually is economic planning.8
By the same token, the term "planning" has been reserved for the feeble efforts
of a comparative handful of government officials, who, having prohibited the planning of
everyone else, presume to substitute their knowledge and intelligence for the knowledge
and intelligence of tens of millions, and to call that planning. This is an
incredible state of affairs, one which implies the most enormous ignorance on the part of
the great majority of today's intellectuals, from journalists to professors....
Notes
8. For elaboration on the nature of economic planning under capitalism,
see below, pp. 269275, and 172294 passim.
|
|